Why it matters
Why it mattersGlobal rules punish normal behavior in one context and miss real risk in another.
What better looks likeOne-size-fits-all scoring produces unfair, inaccurate, and legally fragile decisions.
Problems We Aim To Solve
Five jobs in three years may be normal in seasonal retail but correlate with lower retention in a manufacturing technician pipeline. Global scoring erases that nuance.
Hardcoded assumptions like "job-hopping is always high risk" are wrong as often as they are right. Context decides what a signal means. Riskiy avoids global rules in favor of patterns learned within each pipeline from real outcomes.
Why it mattersGlobal rules punish normal behavior in one context and miss real risk in another.
What better looks likeOne-size-fits-all scoring produces unfair, inaccurate, and legally fragile decisions.
Why it mattersPatterns scoped to pipeline, industry, source, and role type — backed by evidence.
What better looks likeRiskiy generates comparison rules per scope, each with evidence count, confidence, and observed outcome rate.
Why it mattersImproving here means explainable, context-specific review prompts.
What better looks likeScores stay decision support: recruiters see why a feature matters in this pipeline and remain responsible for the decision.
Related